Spectrum Series - Lesson II

NoTrump and Minor Suit Openings


      Any 1-of-a-suit response to 1, 1 or 1 is natural and forcing.   Responder will rarely bypass a 5+card suit to bid at the 2-level, and will only bypass a 4-carder with 13+ points and a 5+ card holding in a suit lower ranked than Opener's (e.g., 1:2 may have a 4-card major with 13+ points) suit.   After any 1-of-a-suit response, the pair will, for the most part, rebid as they would if playing SAYC.  They will rely on a 4th Suit Force to sustain the auction later, if Responder is strong enough to force game.   This game-forcing aspect distinguishes the 2/1 GF 4th suit from its SAYC counterpart, where the 4th Suit is only a ONE round force.

New Minor Forcing (“NMF”)

      One of the most salient differences between SAYC and 2/1 GF after a 1-of-a-major response appears, when Opener rebids 1NT to show a flat hand of 13-14 points.  
11
1NT2
Here, any bid of the unbid (i.e., "new") minor is a one-round force on 12+ points — often looking for a major suit fit.   1:1:1NT:2, then, forces for at least one round and says NOTHING about the bid minor.   Responder could be VOID in this "New Minor" !

11
1NT2
2
      Opener's first priority here would be to show a 4-card holding in the unbid major.   1:1:1NT:2:2, shows a flat 13-14 point hand with 4 Hearts.  Without such a holding, Opener will show 3-card support for Responder's major — jumping with a maximal hand.
11
1NT2
2

      Then, 1:1:1NT:2:2 will reveal 3 Spades and 13 points.
      Meanwhile, 1:1:1NT:2:3 will unveil 3 Spades and 14 points.  
      All other bids deny 3-card support for Responder's suit, with 2NT (13 points) and 3NT (14 points) suggesting strength in the unbid suits.  

      Responder must avoid using the new minor with a 6-11 point 2-suiter.   Instead, Responder must Jump in the minor.  

Responder K Q x x x x Q 10 9 x x x x

After 1:1:1NT, you must rebid 3, NON-forcing,
to avoid bidding an artificial 2 ("NMF").  

11
1NT2
any2NT
11
1NT2
22
      Having made a New-Minor-Forcing bid, each pair will develop understandings as to what is and is not forcing by Responder.   Many will say that Responder's only non-forcing rebid will be 2NT (e.g., 1:1:1NT:2: any:2NT) or 2-of-a-bid-major (e.g., 1:1:1NT:2: 2:2 or 2).  
      Others will say that Responder must bid one of the suits that were not bid at the 1-level (e.g., 1:1: 1NT:2:any:3 or 3) in order to force game here.   Still others will play New Minor Forcing as a game force.  
11
1NT2
2
      One rule remains constant in all partnerships: any rebid by Responder after Opener shows 3-card support for Responder's suit is forcing.   Hence, after 1:1:1NT:2:2 any rebid by Responder (even 2NT) is forcing.

Questions

  1. Bearing in mind that Opener will only go to the 3-level with 14 points, what is Opener's exact distribution and point count in the following auctions ?
    (a) 11
    1NT2
    2
    (b) 11
    1NT2
    2NT
    (c) 11
    1NT2
    3
    (d) 11
    1NT2
    3

  2. After 1:1, should Opener rebid 1 or 1NT with 4 Spades and a flat 13-14 points ?  

  3. If a bid and rebid of the New Minor is forcing (e.g., 1:1:1NT:2:any:3) in our agreements, how do I show a limited hand (6-11 pts) with length in the unbid minor ?

Walsh

A majority of 2/1-GF players employ "Walsh" rather than SAYC's "up the line" method of showing 4+card suits opposite a 1 opening.   Walsh involves Responder bidding a 4-card major before a 4+card Diamond suit, "bypassing" Diamonds — even if they are longer than our 4-card major — unless Responder is strong enough to force game.  
 (i)     5 3     Q 10 9 3     K J 10 9 4 2     4
Respond 1 to 1, if playing Walsh.  
(ii)     A 3     A Q 10 9     A J 10 9 4 2     4
Respond 1 to 1, then reverse into Hearts.

      Walsh's advantages stem from its purpose:
      (1)   Getting our 4-card major in quickly lessens the effect of any pre-empt by Responder's LHO.  
      (2)   Opener need not rebid a major over 1:1 unless unbalanced.   Hence, 1:1:1 tends to promise a 3-suiter or 5+ Clubs.   All balanced 13-14 point Openers rebid 1NT — even those with one or both majors !    

      The disadvantages of Walsh are numerous, among them:
      (1)   The Diamond suit is often buried — especially if the pair plays New Minor Forcing.  
      (2)   By increasing the number of 4-card major responses we increase the number of Moysian (i.e., 4-3) fits that we will experience.  
      (3)   4-4 major suit fits are often wrong-sided.   1:1:1:2 allows Opener to play 2 in SAYC while the Walsh pair sees 1:1:2.  
      (4)   1:1:1NT will no longer promise 4-5 Clubs.  
      (5)   4-4 Spade fits can be lost if Opener rebids 1:1:1NT with four Spades (as many will).  
      (6)   6-point Responder cannot temporize with 1:1, hoping to pass a 1 or 1 rebid, with the same chance of success.   1 Opener might not rebid a major even if holding one !    

Responding to NoTrump Openings

      For the most part, responses to 1NT are the same as in SAYC.   Two differences are the inclusion of Texas Transfers and, in some partnerships, Minor Suit Stayman.   A third is the use of Lebensohl (see Rainbow Lesson #9).

Texas Transfers

      Here, a 4 response to 1NT or 2NT shows 6+ Hearts, forcing Opener to rebid 4.   A 4 reply to 1NT or 2NT shows 6+ spades and forces Opener to rebid 4.

Responder A J 10 x x x   x x x x x   Q x
Reply 4 to 1NT, and hope that Partner remembers that this is a transfer to Spades !   :)

      Note that we could use Jacoby Transfers instead of Texas Transfers.   With 1NT:2:2:4 and 1NT:4:4 available, why have TWO ways to transfer into the same suit ?  

      The answer is two-fold.   First, the Jacoby Transfer, followed by a game bid, invites Opener to slam.   1NT:2:2:4 invites 6, then, while 1NT:4:4 does not.   Secondly, the meaning of a 4NT rebid will be different depending on which transfer is used.   4NT after a Texas Transfer is RKC Blackwood.   4NT directly after a Jacoby Transfer is quantitative.

      Texas Transfers are ON over any interference up to 3.   1NT-3-4 transfers to spades.   1NT-3-4 is an all-purpose Staymanic cuebid.  

Questions

1.   You hold:     A Q x     A x x x     A x x     K x x

      What do you bid after:
(a) 1NT2
24
??
(b) 1NT4
44NT
??
(c) 1NT2
24NT
??
(d) 1NT2
23NT
??

Minor Suit Stayman (“MSS”)

      Nowhere is there more confusion than in the area of Minor Suit Stayman.   First, the 2-over-1 GF notes distributed by OKBridge conflict with the 2/1 GF convention card that OKBridge disseminates.   Secondly, the convention card states that a 2NT response to 1NT is a transfer to 3, but there is NO mention of this in the notes — and only a small minority of 2/1 GF players use this method.  

      Most will opt out of this structure, and play 2 (or 3 in response to 2NT) as a Jacoby minor transfer, as we saw in SAYC.   After 1NT:2 Opener will simply rebid 2NT (with superior Diamonds) or 3.   Responder can stop in 3 or 3 if weak, or bid on as a minor suit slam probe.  

      If you and your partner DO decide to play Minor Suit Stayman, a 2 response to 1NT will promise 9+ points and 5-4 or better in the minors.   Opener rebids as follows:

  2NT = No minor, minimum.  3 or 3 stops now.

  3 or 3 = Natural, minimum.  A raise invites.

  3 or 3 = Maximum, weak in the other major.

  3NT = Maximum, but no minor.  

  4 or 4 = Natural, maximum.  
 

      When playing Minor-Suit Stayman, a direct 3 (1NT:3) or 3 (1NT:3) response is often a weak sign-off.   Some will use a 2NT response to 1NT as a transfer to 3, but this method loses the very important natural 2NT response.   These pairs will typically use 2 (Stayman) followed by 2NT to invite 3NT, with the 2 response being alerted and explained as NOT promising a major.   The problem for these pairs is that if Opener has both majors Opener may jump in the unshown major (e.g., 1NT:2:2:2NT:4) over 2NT.   To prevent this, after 1NT:2:2, Responder must rebid 2 with 4 Spades.   In this way, 1NT:2:2:2NT denies a major !    

      It is strongly recommended that you retain 2NT as a natural raise and that you do NOT employ Minor Suit Stayman.   The SAYC method of natural 2NT raises and Jacoby Minor Transfers is not only simpler; it is superior.

Responding to Minor Suit Openings

      One of the major differences between 2/1 GF and SAYC is that, according to the 2/1 GF convention card, opposite 1 Responder WILL bypass 1 to show a 4-card major unless Responder wishes to force game.   This treatment is NOT recommended.   Bidding your suits UP the line is far SUPERIOR, especially when playing New Minor Forcing.  

Responder Q x x x x x x A 10 x x x x
Replying 1 to 1 will bury the Diamond suit entirely, if Opener rebids 1NT.   You will NOT be able to rebid 2, since that would be artificial.   :(

Inverted Minors

      Unlike SAYC, a 2NT response to 1 or 1 is only invitational in 2/1 GF, promising 10-12 points and a flattish hand.   3NT reveals 13-15 points in response to 1 or 1.   Often, though, a strong Responder will take a slower route, beginning with a Forcing raise of the minor (e.g., 1:2 or 1:2).   Such a raise is a one-round force, showing at least 10 HCPs.
      In this way, Responder can make a limit raise by bidding Opener's minor twice,   1:2:any:3 or 1:2:any:3, cancelling the force.   Any other suit rebid by Responder is forcing to game.  

Responder x x A J x Q 10 9 x x K J x
To make a Limit raise of 1, bid 2, then 3.  

      The 2/1 GF Notes state that, after the inverted raise, Opener will rebid a four card major.   This is NOT the norm.   MUCH more common is for Opener to rebid a major suit STOPPER, bidding 2NT with a minimal hand that has both majors guarded.   1:2:3, or 1:2:3 then, would suggest NO major suit stoppers in Opener's hand.   A jump rebid of 3NT by Opener (e.g., 1:2:3NT or 1:2:3NT) shows a flat 18-19 points and says nothing about guards.  

      With the direct raise (1:2 and 1:2) taking care of both the Forcing and the Limit raises in the minors, a Jump raise (1:3 or 1:3) becomes PRE-EMPTIVE.   Responder would have a weak hand with 5+cards in the raised minor:

Responder J x x x x Q J x x x x 10 x

      Jump raise 1 to 3.  

      As in SAYC, any immediate raise of Opener's minor denies a 4+card major.  If Opener's minor-suit opening is overcalled, a single raise is still strong (limit or better) and forcing for one round in 2/1-GF-OK.   1-1-2, then, is inverted in 2/1-GF-OK.   ALL other versions of 2/1-GF play it as natural and non-forcing, 6-9 points.  

      Should the opening 1 or 1 bid be DOUBLED, any raise of Opener's minor is weak.   1-Dble-2, then, is weakish (5-8 points, 5+ Clubs) and NOT inverted.

Questions

1.   You hold:     A Q x     Q x x x     K x x     K x x
      What do you bid after 1:2 ?
2.   You hold:     A Q x     x x     K Q J x x     Q x x
      What do you bid after 1:2 ?
3.   You hold:     x x     Q J x     A x x x x     K J x
      What do you bid after 1:2:2 ?
4.   You hold:     x x     K x x     A x x x x     A Q x
      What do you bid after 1:2:2 ?

Discussion Points

  1. What is forcing after a New Minor Force ?
    Only an unshown suit ?
    Only a jump ?
    Everything ?
    Everything except 2NT or 2-of-Responder's-major ?

    2/1-Spectrum = An unshown suit, or 2NT if Opener supported Responder's major.

  2. Do we really play Minor-Suit Stayman, where 2 promises 9+ points ?
    If so, how do we show a weak hand with a long minor ?

    2/1-K and 2/1-Spectrum = Use 2 as a Jacoby, NOT mss.

  3. Is 1NT:2NT natural ?

    2/1-K and 2/1-Spectrum = Yes.

  4. Does 1:2:2 promise four Hearts ?
    Does it show as unbalanced hand ?

    2/1-K & 2/1-Spectrum = No and No.

  5. Do we play New-Minor Forcing by a passed hand ?

    2/1-K and 2/1 Spectrum = No.
    2/1-Shep = Yes.


Final Quiz

1.   After 1:1:1NT, what would you bid as Responder ?
(1a) Holding:  A Q x x x K x x x x Q x x
(1b) Holding: K Q J x x x   x x Q x x K x
(1c) Holding: Q J x x x K x x x   x x x x
(1d) Holding: K J x x x x x A Q x x x   x

2.   What do you respond to Partner's 1 opening bid ?
(2a) Holding:  K J x A Q x x x J 10 x x x
(2b) Holding:  K J x A Q x A x x J 10 x x
(2c) Holding:  x x Q x x K Q x x x x   x x
(2d) Holding:  A x A Q x A Q x x x x x x
(2e) Holding:  A x x x   x A Q x x x K x x
(2f) Holding:  x x K Q x J x x A J x x x
(2g) Holding:  A x K J x x   A x Q J x x x

--------------- Last Revised 13-03-2003 ---------------

Valid HTML 4.0 Transitional saved from url=http://www.firesides.ca/spectrm2.htm

inserted by FC2 system